Menu Close

February 1996 decisions

February 1996 decisions

This is the first full month under the criteria of the Overseas Investment Amendment Act passed last year. Unsurprisingly, although the new Act was supposed to tighten up on overseas sales of land, the great majority of the decisions are for land sales. There is no sign of additional scrutiny and no rejections.

Only independent drug manufacturer sells “Karitane” to baby food pariah

Nutricia Ltd, a subsidiary of one of the villains of the international controversy over the marketing of breast-milk substitutes, has approval to take over the nutritional food business of Douglas Pharmaceutical Ltd and Douglas Nutrition Ltd. Nutricia is a subsidiary of NV Verenigde Bedrijven Nutricia of the Netherlands. The Douglas group is the only locally owned pharmaceutical manufacturer in competition with the huge drug transnationals and produces the Karitane infant formula products, a brand it bought from the Karitane Society. The amount paid by Nutricia is suppressed.

The issues underlying the breast-milk controversy are summed up in Multinational Monitor, March 1992, “A Formula for disaster”, p.9-13, by Ellen Sokol:

“In 1984, when Nestle signed an agreement pledging to abide by the World Health Organisation (WHO)/UNICEF International Code of Marketing Breast-milk Substitutes, consumer leaders agreed to suspend the 7-year boycott against the Swiss food giant. The boycott leaders felt a genuine sense of accomplishment following an almost decade-long fight. Unfortunately, the battle over infant formula promotion continues today, nearly eight years later.

The stakes in the ongoing battle are high, because infant formula companies’ marketing efforts strongly influence women’s decision to breastfeed newborns or to use breast-milk substitutes, and that decision has tremendously important implications for the health of infants.

There is nothing that equals breastfeeding in providing proper nourishment for infants. Breast-milk has the advantage of containing antibodies that help protect the baby against many common childhood illnesses. It is sterile, always at the right temperature, inexpensive and nearly every mother has more than enough for her baby. There is also an important relationship between breastfeeding and child spacing.

Babies who are not breastfed are fed with some type of substitute, usually by bottle. For bottle feeding to be safe, there must be clean water, fuel and facilities to boil the water and sterilise the equipment, adequate income to be able to afford the milk powder and a level of literacy that allows for the mixing and sterilising instructions to be carefully followed.

In the developing world, the risk of death for infants who do not breastfeed is ten to fifteen times greater in the first three to four months of life than for babies who are fed only breast-milk. Despite the important role that breastfeeding plays in preventing malnutrition and infection in infants and young children, the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding have declined in many parts of the world.

As far back as 1974, public interest groups advocating for better infant health and the World Health Assembly, the official governing body of WHO, identified aggressive and often inappropriate marketing of breast-milk substitutes as a significant factor contributing to the alarming decline in breastfeeding rates and an associated increase in young infants’ morbidity rates worldwide.

In October 1979, UNICEF and WHO organised a Meeting on Infant and Young Child Feeding that was attended by 150 representatives of governments, public-interest organisations, the infant food industry and experts in related disciplines. The main outcome of this meeting was the recommendation that “there should be an international code of marketing of infant formula and other related products used as breast-milk substitutes.” Two years later, the World Health Assembly approved the final version of the International Code.”

Yet the companies continue to break the code. The International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) in October 1991 identified the worst offenders as Nestlé, Wyeth (a subsidiary of American Home Products), two German companies, Milupa (remember that name) and Hipp, and the Japanese company, Meiji. Nestlé, as the market leader, was always seen as the chief offender, but Multinational Monitor listed Milupa, Nutricia and Cow & Gate (U.K. domiciled but owned by Nutricia) as fifth, sixth and seventh by worldwide sales, as also being significant in their violations of the WHA Code.

Milupa was a subsidiary of Altana and was found to be totally or substantially violating several sections concerning labelling, promotion in healthcare facilities, promotion to healthcare workers, giving free samples and the marketing of soft foods. Milupa has also been criticised for its marketing of heavily of heavily sugared baby herbal drinks. In December 1990, a Frankfurt court ordered the company to pay compensation to parents for causing severe dental caries in two children. The company was accused of negligence and providing insufficient warning on packaging about the sugar content of its products. About 100,000 children are said to have suffered severe tooth damage from these drinks marketed by Milupa and other producers. (Ref: Multinational Monitor, op cit, and World Wide Web, http://www.mcspotlight.org/beyond/nestle.html, “McSpotlight on the Baby Milk Industry”.)

Nutricia is a violator of the Code by promoting baby milk to health workers, and giving free samples or supplies. It is also only in partial compliance in its labelling, promotion in healthcare facilities, and inappropriate marketing of follow-up milks. Their Cow & Gate Plus products used pictures of babies on labelling in Sierra Leone in 1990, and carried no health warning or reference to advice from health workers. It also engaged in promotion in healthcare facilities, and was only in partial compliance in other areas of the Code.

As recently as March 1996 Nutricia has had formula baby milk imports to the U.S. detained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for being an “Unregistered LACF Manufacturer”. (e.g. World Wide Web, http://www.fda.gov/ora/ids/3/ora_ids_i_3_40.html , “Detentions for Industry 40”.)

Nutricia is on an acquisition campaign. It is currently taking over Milupa and the take over has been referred to the U.K. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC) because of its implications to the baby milks and meals market there. (Chemist & Druggist Newsweekly, 6/4/96, “Nutricia’s acquisition of Milupa referred to MMC”.) Another acquisition led the U.K. Competition and Consumer Affairs Minister, to order that Nutricia should be required to give price undertakings restricting Nutricia’s ability to exploit its position in the specialist gluten-free and low-protein food market. This followed its merger with Valio International UK Ltd now known as Scientific Hospital Supplies Holdings Ltd (SHS). (Department of Trade and Industry, U.K., Press Release, 21/12/95.) His decision followed the publication of a report by the MMC which concluded that the acquisition by Nutricia of SHS “may be expected to operate against the public interest by strengthening Nutricia’s ability to increase prices for a number of specialist gluten-free and low-protein products (including bread, rolls, and flour mixes). The MMC recommend that Nutricia undertake for a period of four years to set prices of these products no higher than at present plus the annual change in the retail price index less two percentage points.”

Nutricia is also involved in privatisation of East European industry: it has acquired a 22.5% stake in Hajdutej Tejipari, Hungary’s largest regional dairy and owns a distribution joint venture in Hungary. It also owns two dairy companies in Poland and two in the Czech Republic. (World Wide Web, http://www.business-europa.co.uk/bbhung.html, The European Business Home Page, Business Europa Magazine, Summer 1995.)

The buyout is particularly poignant in that the Douglas group is the “only New Zealand-based manufacturer of pharmaceuticals” (Press, 5/2/93, “Drug company ready to act”), the second-largest pharmaceutical supplier in New Zealand (Press, 31/3/95, “Douglas growth”, p.21), and an important supplier of “generic” competitors to the brand-name pharmaceuticals of the transnational companies, succeeding despite restrictive patent rules designed to protect the transnationals. In addition the Karitane name and brand has particular significance to New Zealanders. This brand is presumably the object of this sale, though it is not clear if other products are also involved.

Douglas Pharmaceuticals was founded by Graeme Douglas, then a retail pharmacist at Te Atatu South, in 1967. Its most important “generic” product is the asthma drug Atomide Forte, which does the same job as Beclo Forte, made by U.K. transnational (originally of Aotearoa), Glaxo. In February 1995, Glaxo challenged the Ministry of Health in the High Court when it said Atomide Forte had passed safety tests and could be used in place of Beclo Forte. Glaxo argued that the two were not equivalent. At that time Glaxo was earning $17 million a year from its inhaled asthma drugs, and generics were earning only about $1 million. (Press, 21/2/95, “Government’s generic medicines list facing legal challenge from drug company”, p.6.) Douglas also markets ZenoDerm which was developed by a company with ties to Otago University. It reduces scarring from wounds, burns and leg ulcers. In addition Douglas does contract manufacturing for about ten transnationals, which “have closed their manufacturing plants and retrenched to Australia since the Closer Economic Relations agreement and New Zealand’s abolition of subsidies.” Douglas employs 165 staff including 45 scientists and three medical practitioners. (Press, 10/2/93, “Douglases beat the patent handicap”.)

Skellerup, 25th biggest company in Aotearoa, now an overseas company

Skellerup Group Ltd, formerly a public company 30% owned by Brierley Investments but subject to a management buy-out last December, is now owned by Maine Investments Ltd which is 84% owned by GS Affiliated Funds associated with GS Capital Partners II of the U.S.A. and 16% by members of the senior management of Skellerup Group Ltd, all of whom are Aotearoa residents. The price paid was “approximately” $407,129,262. According to press reports, “GS” stands for Goldman Sachs, the U.S. finance house which financed Skellerup chief executive Murray Bolton in the buy-out. It was financed by equity provided by the Skellerup management group and the Goldman Sachs funds, and senior debt and subordinated debt provided by a syndicate of financial institutions. (Press, 20/12/96, “Skellerup chief steers $400m bid to buy company”, p.25.) Prior to the buy-out, Skellerup, though controlled by Brierleys and hence technically an overseas company, had an exemption from the overseas investment regulations. On 2 April that exemption was cancelled.

Skellerup is a diversified conglomerate of manufacturing companies assembled by Brierleys from its other acquisitions. According to Brierley annual reports, it includes the original Skellerup Industries based on the old Christchurch family firm’s rubber products; Masport, the mower company now making wood fires, barbeques and operating Aotearoa’s largest iron foundry; Paykel engineering supplies, Projex equipment hire, Skellerup Flooring, Cable Price Corporation, and Viking Footwear; Lane’s Industries, including market leader Palmers Gardenworld, and Watkins seeds; DML Resources, formerly Downer Mining, the largest contract mining and earthmoving organisation in Aotearoa; Dominion Salt, the sole producer and refiner of industrial, food, rural and pharmaceutical salt products in Aotearoa, jointly owned with Cerebos Greggs; the Levene Group retailing home decorating products; and Dunlop Flow Technology. In 1995 the Group was the 25th largest company in Aotearoa (ranked by turnover in Management, December 1995).

Blue Star Group sold to US Office Products Company

The office products retail and wholesale business has undergone a massive restructuring over the last few months, which has ended with it being controlled by three major companies, two of which are overseas owned. This month the OIC gave approval to US Office Products Company of the U.S.A. to acquire 51% of the Blue Star Group Ltd for an initially suppressed amount. That amount was released on appeal, in April 1997: $63,391,289. Blue Star started life as Panasonic Office Automation, owned by Fisher and Paykel Industries. The name was changed to Blue Star Automation and it was sold to former Xerox executive, Eric Watson, in 1993. He will still own 47% of the company. Since then Blue Star has acquired more than 25 companies and is Aotearoa’s largest supplier of telecommunications equipment, copiers and fax machines and the second largest supplier of office supplies, according to Watson. It employs 1,000 people operating out of 45 locations and claims over 50,000 business customers. Its recent acquisitions have included U-Bix Business Machines, Wang New Zealand (30%), Turners Office Products, and Boanas Print. Washington-based US Office Products is on an expansion spree itself, having recently bought 17 U.S. companies for $US136 million, and eyeing more companies in Australia and Aotearoa. It has a market capitalisation of about $NZ660 million and annual revenue forecast for the year of $NZ1.2 billion.

The two main competitors to Blue Star/USOP are U.S.-controlled Corporate Express, and the old-established but several times restructured and expanded, Whitcoulls, which is currently the subject of a controversial buy-out by majority shareholder and chairman, Graeme Hart.

Corporate Express, acting through its 51% owned Australian subsidiary, Corporate Express Australia, recently bought Berrymans, the last substantial independent stationer in the South Island, and Park Lane, a private Auckland stationery firm. It has announced its intention to “either buy a company or open an office in Wellington in the next two months to give it a national presence.” The names of the companies would eventually be changed to Corporate Express. Corporate Express Australia, which focuses on the high-volume end of the market, is here “to attack the market, but not decimate it” according to its managing director, Martin Chimes. The U.S. parent is the largest stationery company in the U.S.A. and the second largest in Canada with annual revenue of about $US2 billion and over 12,500 employees. The Australian operation is the largest there, and the company’s objective was to be number one or two globally. Like USOP, it has been buying up in a big way: in April it announced purchases of eight other companies in the U.K., Alaska and other parts of America. It recently bought a large courier company, US Delivery Systems for more than $600 million, and Richard Young Journal, America’s biggest distributor of computer supplies. Corporate Express Australia was founded in 1987 by buying a New South Wales company, Macquarie Office. It now has 1,100 staff, 35 sites and $365 million in revenue in Australasia.

(Refs: Press, 9/3/96, “US Office Products expanding”, p.31; 14/3/96, “Blue Star captures 54% of U-Bix in takeover move”, p.29; 4/4/95, “Berrymans sale marks end of small NZ stationery retailers”, p.34; 9/4/96, “Blue Star planning further expansion”, p.32; 16/4/96, “Corporate Express plans NZ-wide stores”, p.32.)

British Telecom takes 25% of Clear

A British Telecommunications Plc subsidiary, Newgate (NZ) Holdings Ltd, has approval to acquire the 25% of Clear Communications Ltd currently owned by Bell Canada International Inc. The price is suppressed. The rest of Clear is owned by 25% each by Television New Zealand Ltd, The Todd Corporation Ltd (both of Aotearoa), and MCI Communications Corporation (U.S.A.). British Telecom is said to be strong in providing telecommunications to transnationals. Clear, the aggressive competitor to Telecom in its toll services, is increasingly involved in wider activities including Internet and data services, and is about to begin providing fibre optic to connect business customers directly to its exchanges in Auckland and Wellington.

Tiongs take complete control of Regal Salmon

Salmond Smith Biolab Ltd, which is owned by the Tiong Group of Malaysia has approval to buy the business and assets of Regal Salmon Ltd, of which it already owns 53%, for “approximately” $22,680,000. The sale includes eight hectares of land in Canterbury and 0.25 hectares in Marlborough. Salmond Smith owns Southern Ocean Seafoods and will combine the two operations, giving them 71% of the country’s farmed salmon output. “It is intended that new Asian markets particularly in Malaysia be developed.” Salmond Smith also has horticulture, food processing, scientific products and plasticware divisions. See the commentary on August and September 1995 OIC decisions for further details.

Hectare of Auckland CBD land sold to Singapore company for $12m

The ubiquitous Stanley Tan (Singapore, 80%) and George Horsburgh (Aotearoa, 20%) have approval to buy up an unimproved 1.03 hectares of land currently being used as a car park in central Auckland. It is “most of the land” bounded by Queen, Turner and Liverpool Streets and City Road. The price is “approximately” $12 million. They are buying it through their company Entwistle Enterprises (owned in the above proportions) from Mainzeal Group Ltd which itself became an overseas company only in April 1995, being 51% owned by Richina Equity Trust of China. Tan and Horsburgh propose to develop the property “with a view to a possible mixed use development combining both residential and commercial aspects”. They are behind the varyingly successful Pacific Group Ltd, The Habitat Group, Firle Holdings Ltd, New Zealand Land Ltd, Dynasty Pacific and other hotel and property development companies.

More land bought to extend the Waihi gold mine

More land is being acquired for the Waihi Gold Mine in and around Waihi. The purchase of three blocks of residential land has been approved, the first of which is being purchased from the Crown, the others from private individuals: 0.1012 hectares at 2 and 4 Haszard Street for $95,000; 1.2040 hectares in Matangia Road for $194,000; and 0.4048 hectares at 3 Pitt St for $175,000. The purchases are all by Waihi Gold Company Nominees Ltd of Australia, which “holds rural and urban land in and around Waihi as trustee for the participants in the Waihi Gold Mining joint venture.” It is owned 28.35% each by Waihi Mines Ltd and Welcome Gold Mines Ltd, 27.84% by AUAG Resources Ltd, and 15.46% by Martha Mining Ltd. All of these companies are Australian owned except AUAG Resources, which is owned in Aotearoa.

“The property is being acquired to enable the extension of the existing mining operation. … The proposed extension of the mine will extend the life of the mine for an additional seven years (approximately) and this will result in continued employment for the 165 people employed in the operation. The applicant states that the extended operation will entail the further investment of significant development capital.”

Land for Forestry

  • RII Marlborough Ltd, owned by U.S.A. pension funds and “non profitable charitable and educational institutions” has approval to buy three blocks of land in Northland for forestry development: of 289 hectares, 382 hectares, and 439 hectares. RII has acquired considerable land holdings for forestry in the Nelson/Marlborough and Wanganui areas. In each case, the price was suppressed but was released after appeal in April 1997: respectively $853,700, $972,350, and $1,270,550.
  • Carter Holt Harvey Ltd, 51% owned by International Paper Ltd of the U.S.A., continues to buy up farm land. It has approval this month to buy three blocks of land in the King Country: 150 hectares in Okaihae Road, Taumarunui (Taranaki land registry) for $175,000 from Byelich Farms Ltd who are retaining 47 hectares for pastoral farming; 81 hectares in Kururau Road, Otunui (Taranaki land registry) for $148,392 from GJ Street Ltd which is retaining 110 hectares for pastoral farming; and 1,660 hectares in the Kaiteke area (Wellington land registry) for $3,500,000 from A.H. and P.D. Bayly who want to sell because it is in a “tuberculosis endemic area”. The purchases are part of Carter Holt’s “purchasing programme to enable it to establish new forest areas to expand its renewable resources and raw materials for the wood processing industry in the future.”
  • Evergreen Forests Ltd which is 62% owned by Xylem Funds 1 L.P. of the U.S.A. has approval to buy West Ho Station Ltd which owns 1,165 hectares of afforested land in Gisborne, for $2,670,000. The land requires “significant expenditure on roading and pruning in the short term”. Evergreen owns land adjacent to West Ho. For details on the formation and ownership of Evergreen see our commentary on the December 1994 OIC decisions.
  • Ernslaw One Ltd, owned by the Tiong family of Malaysia has approval to buy further land near Dannevirke. One approval is for 1,104 hectares in Johnson’s Road, Te Uri for an initially suppressed amount revealed on appeal to be $1,100,000. A second is for 723 hectares in Te Uri Road for $740,000. Ernslaw

“aims to establish a Pinus Radiata forest in the Horowhenua/Manawatu and Southern Hawkes Bay/Dannevirke regions over the next five years. …The new planted area in conjunction with Ernslaw’s existing forest interests in the region will provide Ernslaw with the resource base required to establish a major wood processing plant in a 15 to 20 year time frame.”

  • Southland Plantation Forest Company of New Zealand Ltd, ultimately owned by New Oji Paper Company Ltd and Itochu Ltd of Japan, has approval to buy 245 hectares of land at Waimahaka, Southland for $510,000 for forestry. As usual with its purchases, all forestry activities will be conducted under contract by South Wood Export Ltd, which is owned 66.6% by MK Hunt Foundation Ltd of Aotearoa and 33.3% by C Itoh and Company of Japan. The land is being sold “due to the unrealistic returns from farming the property”.

Other rural land

  • Two residents of Israel who “are intending to immigrate to New Zealand and reside on the property” have approval to buy eight hectares of land at Tai Tapu, Christchurch for $470,000. “The primary purpose for the purchase of the property is to provide a home for their family. In addition the applicants propose to continue to use the balance of the land for cattle raising and cropping.” The vendors are selling to run a business nearer to Christchurch.

Internal Restructuring

  • Carter Holt Harvey Ltd or a subsidiary is given approval to acquire the minority shares in “various Carter Holt Harvey ‘Group’ subsidiaries which have nine specified securities held by other persons” in order to amalgamate the companies. CHH is 51% owned by International Paper Ltd of the U.S.A.
CyberPlace

Leave a Reply